pypiserver/pypiserver

Mention GitHub Discussions as a community place in README

Open

#515 opened on Aug 22, 2023

View on GitHub
 (2 comments) (0 reactions) (1 assignee)Python (291 forks)batch import
difficulty.easygood first issuetag.docstype.Discussion

Repository metrics

Stars
 (1,663 stars)
PR merge metrics
 (Avg merge 3d 18h) (7 merged PRs in 30d)

Description

What

Lately, I've been starting to use more Discussions to give some announcements.

Why

Due to the limited time availability on my side, I found this feature quite convenient and quickly accessible from within the same GitHub environment and thus I'm quite comfortable with it.

We also have a Zulip channel but, unfortunately, I don't manage to find enough time to engage in discussions there - for which I apologize separately.

Proposal

How about we add a tiny mention of Discussionsin the README, along with the Zulip channel?

TODOs

  • Add a little note about Discussions in the README

I would like to keep both Discussions and Zulip as open options and if anyone's interested in developing more ground for engagement in either of the channels, please feel free to participate and suggest any ideas, I'd be very curious.

Contributor guide

Research direction
Add a section in the README mentioning GitHub Discussions for announcements and community engagement, alongside the Zulip channel link.
Tech stack
python
Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
DifficultyEstimated implementation difficulty for a new contributor, from 1 for very small changes to 5 for expert-level work.
1
Estimated timeA rough time range for an experienced contributor to investigate, implement, test, and prepare a pull request.
Under 1 hour
Activity statusHow available the issue appears right now: fresh, active, stale, blocked, or waiting on maintainer input.
Active
ClarityHow clearly the issue explains the expected change, acceptance criteria, and next step.
Clear
Prerequisites
Git
Newbie friendlinessA 1-100 score estimating how approachable this issue is for first-time contributors.
95