langgenius/dify

[Chore/Refactor] 'use' is preferred over 'useContext' because it is more flexible

Closed

#25,193 opened on Sep 5, 2025

View on GitHubContributor guide
 (8 comments) (1 reaction) (0 assignees)TypeScript (22,210 forks)batch import
good first issueno-issue-activityproject#difyrefactor🙏 help wanted

Repository metrics

Stars
 (141,412 stars)
PR merge metrics
 (Avg merge 1d 21h) (579 merged PRs in 30d)

Description

Self Checks

  • I have read the Contributing Guide and Language Policy.
  • This is only for refactoring, if you would like to ask a question, please head to Discussions.
  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report, otherwise it will be closed.
  • 【中文用户 & Non English User】请使用英语提交，否则会被关闭 ：）
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

Description

use use

Motivation

'use' is preferred over 'useContext' because it is more flexible

Additional Context

https://react.dev/reference/react/use#reading-context-with-use

Contributor guide

Research direction
Replace all uses of 'useContext' with 'use' in React components. Check the React documentation for the 'use' API and ensure compatibility with current React version. Run tests to verify no regressions.
Tech stack
typescriptreact
Domain
frontend
Issue type
Refactor
DifficultyEstimated implementation difficulty for a new contributor, from 1 for very small changes to 5 for expert-level work.
2
Estimated timeA rough time range for an experienced contributor to investigate, implement, test, and prepare a pull request.
1-3 hours
Activity statusHow available the issue appears right now: fresh, active, stale, blocked, or waiting on maintainer input.
Active
ClarityHow clearly the issue explains the expected change, acceptance criteria, and next step.
Clear
Prerequisites
TypeScriptReact
Newbie friendlinessA 1-100 score estimating how approachable this issue is for first-time contributors.
80