TulipaEnergy/TulipaEnergyModel.jl

Add Zone of Interest advice to flex temp docs

Closed

#1,020 opened on Feb 17, 2025

View on GitHub
 (3 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)Julia (37 forks)auto 404
good first issuestale

Repository metrics

Stars
 (79 stars)
PR merge metrics
 (PR metrics pending)

Description

Description

@datejada I think on the OBZ repo you said it's good to have the resolution the same across the Zone of Interest to get better results? If so, let's add it to the docs.

Validation and testing

No response

Motivation

Build and share knowledge

Target audience

Users

Can you help?

Sure

Contributor guide

Research direction
Review the existing flex temp documentation, then add a note about keeping resolution consistent across the Zone of Interest for better results, referencing the original source if needed.
Tech stack
julia
Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
DifficultyEstimated implementation difficulty for a new contributor, from 1 for very small changes to 5 for expert-level work.
1
Estimated timeA rough time range for an experienced contributor to investigate, implement, test, and prepare a pull request.
Under 1 hour
Activity statusHow available the issue appears right now: fresh, active, stale, blocked, or waiting on maintainer input.
Active
ClarityHow clearly the issue explains the expected change, acceptance criteria, and next step.
Clear
Prerequisites
Git
Newbie friendlinessA 1-100 score estimating how approachable this issue is for first-time contributors.
85