JuliaDynamics/RecurrenceAnalysis.jl

`LocalRecurrenceRate` does not give correct/expected results on analytically resolvable input

Open

#142 opened on Feb 20, 2023

View on GitHubContributor guide
 (0 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)Julia (16 forks)auto 404
bughelp wantedhigh priority

Repository metrics

Stars
 (50 stars)
PR merge metrics
 (PR metrics pending)

Description

Have a look at our analytic tests: https://github.com/JuliaDynamics/RecurrenceAnalysis.jl/blob/main/test/rmatrix_analytic.jl#L97-L116

The local recurrence rate results are wrong. They do not give what is expected analytically and due to the symmetries of the input set. Something is wrong. We have to fix this.

Contributor guide

Research direction
Examine the analytic test file at test/rmatrix analytic.jl lines 97-116, understand the expected analytical results, then trace the implementation of LocalRecurrenceRate to identify the discrepancy.
Tech stack
julia
Domain
data
Issue type
Bug
DifficultyEstimated implementation difficulty for a new contributor, from 1 for very small changes to 5 for expert-level work.
3
Estimated timeA rough time range for an experienced contributor to investigate, implement, test, and prepare a pull request.
Half day
Activity statusHow available the issue appears right now: fresh, active, stale, blocked, or waiting on maintainer input.
Fresh
ClarityHow clearly the issue explains the expected change, acceptance criteria, and next step.
Clear
Prerequisites
Julia
Newbie friendlinessA 1-100 score estimating how approachable this issue is for first-time contributors.
60